影响因子百分位在学术期刊跨学科评价中的局限性

Limitations of journal impact factor percentile in interdisciplinary evaluation of academic journals

DOI：10.11946/cjstp.201806080508
中文关键词: 期刊影响因子百分位  学术期刊  期刊评价  跨学科评价
英文关键词: Journal impact factor percentile  Academic journal  Journal evaluation  Interdisciplinary evaluation
摘要点击次数: 222
全文下载次数: 238

DOI：10.11946/cjstp.201806080508
中文关键词: 期刊影响因子百分位  学术期刊  期刊评价  跨学科评价
英文关键词: Journal impact factor percentile  Academic journal  Journal evaluation  Interdisciplinary evaluation
摘要点击次数: 222
全文下载次数: 238

中文摘要:

      【目的】 探讨影响因子百分位(Journal Impact Factor Percentile，JIFP)在学术期刊跨学科评价中的局限性。【方法】 通过JCR数据库获取相关数据，结合JIFP计算公式进行分析，揭示JIFP的局限性。【结果】 JIFP的数值过于依赖学科规模；JIFP过分强调影响因子排序而掩盖了影响因子数值的差异；同一期刊在不同学科的JIFP差异明显。【结论】 JIFP应用于学术期刊跨学科评价具有明显局限性，应慎重使用JIFP进行期刊跨学科评价。

英文摘要:

      ［Purposes］ This study aims to explore the limitations of journal impact factor percentile(JIFP)in interdisciplinary evaluation of academic journals. ［Methods］ We obtained relevant data through the JCR database and revealed the limitations of JIFP according to the JIFP calculation formula. ［Findings］ The value of JIFP is excessively dependent on the scale of subjects; it over-emphasizes the order of impact factors and covers up the difference in the impact factor values; JIFP of the same journal in different disciplines is significantly different. ［Conclusions］ The application of JIFP in interdisciplinary evaluation of academic journals has obvious limitations, and JIFP should be used carefully for interdisciplinary evaluation of academic journals.