文章摘要
王凤产. 科技期刊开放性同行评议可行性探究. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 28(1): 14-19
科技期刊开放性同行评议可行性探究
Feasibility research on open peer review of scientific journals
投稿时间:2017-07-23  修订日期:2017-10-23
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201707230615
中文关键词: 科技期刊  开放性同行评议  封闭式同行评议  利益
英文关键词: Scientific journal  Open peer review  Blind peer review  Benefit
摘要点击次数: 164
全文下载次数: 225
基金项目:河南师范大学博士科研启动课题(5102109179103);中国高校科技期刊研究会专项(CUJS2017-016)。
作者单位E-mail
王凤产 《河南师范大学学报》编辑部河南省新乡市建设东路46号 453007 wangfc2002@163.com 
中文摘要:
      【目的】 进一步推动科技期刊开放性同行评议的研究、变革与实践。【方法】 将开放性同行评议与传统的封闭式同行评议进行比较,对开放性同行评议的优势进行论述。【结果】 开放性同行评议的评议过程具有透明性、公开性、公平性和公正性的特点;使同行评议系统的层次性质平坦化;提高期刊内容的传播速度;为评议人员赢得声誉与尊重;进一步提高稿源质量和期刊质量;有助于科技期刊吸引更多的开创性、冒险性的作者;创造自由讨论的公共学术研究环境。【结论】 开放性同行评议给作者、评审人员、科技期刊、读者和学术界都带来大量的利益,科技期刊应该更新办刊理念,尝试探索开放性同行评议。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This paper aims to promote the research, reform, and practice of open peer review of scientific journals in China. [Methods] We compared the open peer review with the traditional blind peer review, and discussed the advantages of open peer review. [Findings] The process of open peer review of scientific journals has the characteristics of transparency, openness, fairness, and impartiality, flattens the hierarchical nature of peer review systems, speeds up the propagation of the journal contents, wins academic reputation and respect for reviewers, improves the quality of journal articles, attracts more risk taking and innovative authors, and creates a free public academic research environment. [Conclusions] Open peer review of scientific journals has brought a great deal of benefits to authors, reviewers, scientific journals, readers, and scholarly communities. Scientific journals should update the concept and try to explore open peer review.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看