文章摘要
尚淑贤,颜艳,吴晓初. 中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验摘要报告质量评估. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017, 28(12): 1121-1127
中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验摘要报告质量评估
Report quality assessment of randomized controlled trial abstracts from Chinese clinical journals
投稿时间:2017-07-05  修订日期:2017-09-15
DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201707050556
中文关键词: 随机对照试验  摘要  临床试验报告统一标准  期刊论文  报告质量
英文关键词: Randomized controlled trial  Abstract  Consolidated standard of reporting trial  Journal article  Report quality
摘要点击次数: 444
全文下载次数: 538
基金项目:中国科协精品科技期刊工程项目第四期“期刊学术质量提升项目”(2015—2017)。
作者单位E-mail
尚淑贤 中国医学科学院皮肤病研究所北京协和医学院《中华皮肤科杂志》编辑部江苏省南京市蒋王庙街12号 210042 shangshuxian78@aliyun.com 
颜艳 中国医学科学院皮肤病研究所北京协和医学院《中华皮肤科杂志》编辑部江苏省南京市蒋王庙街12号 210042 zpbjb_yanyan@aliyun.com 
吴晓初 中国医学科学院皮肤病研究所北京协和医学院《中华皮肤科杂志》编辑部江苏省南京市蒋王庙街12号 210042  
中文摘要:
      【目的】 评估7种优秀中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验(RCT)摘要报告质量,为提高我国医学期刊RCT摘要报告质量提供依据。【方法】 在万方数据库中检索7种临床医学期刊近年来发表的RCT文献,根据《期刊与学术会议论文摘要中报告随机对照试验的CONSORT声明》评估摘要报告质量。【结果】 检索到RCT文献284篇,摘要条目总体报告率为41.10%~50.00%,平均报告率为46.03%。《中华儿科杂志》《中华内科杂志》《中华眼科杂志》2011—2013年稿约中无摘要CONSORT要求,RCT摘要条目报告率平均为45.38%,2014—2016年稿约中有摘要CONSORT要求,摘要条目报告率平均为45.11%。摘要条目中,目的和结论报告率最高,报告率为100%,分配隐藏方法、试验注册、标题、试验设计等条目报告率较低。【结论】 我国医学期刊RCT摘要报告质量有待提高,尤其应当加强针对标题、试验设计、是否采用盲法、分析例数、试验注册等条目的报告。期刊编辑应当重视并且主动承担RCT摘要规范化的责任,保证RCT摘要的质量。
英文摘要:
      [Purposes] This paper aims to assess reporting quality of randomized controlled trial(RCT)abstracts from seven leading Chinese clinical journals and provide a basis for improving reporting quality of RCT abstracts of Chinese medical journals. [Methods] RCT abstracts published in seven clinical journals in recent years were searched in Wanfang Database. The reporting quality of RCT abstracts was assessed based on the <i>Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials</i>(CONSORT)<i>for Reporting Randomised Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts</i>. [Findings] Totally, 284 RCT abstracts are eligible for this study which show an overall adherence rate of 46. 03% to the CONSORT checklist for abstracts. Among 7 journals, the overall adherence rate varies from 41. 10% to 50. 00%. The overall adherence rate is 45. 38% in 45 RCT abstracts from <i>Chinese Journal of Pediatrics</i>, <i>Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine</i>, and <i>Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology</i> from 2011 to 2013 when the CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in abstracts is not endorsed in their instructions to authors, similar to that(45. 11%)in 35 RCT abstracts from 2014 to 2016. Of these scored items, objective and conclusions are fully reported in all the abstracts, while a low adherence rate is observed for some items, including allocation concealment, trial registration, title, trial design, etc. [Conclusions] There is a need to further improve reporting quality of RCT abstracts in Chinese medical journals, and the reporting of title, trial design, blinding, and trial registration is especially required to be improved. Journal editors should shoulder the responsibility to standardize RCT abstracts and ensure their qualities.
HTML   查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信扫一扫看