Abstract:[Purposes] The objective is to investigate the final review of papers in different places and improve the academic quality and the influence of scientific journals.[Methods] Between April and June 2015, this paper is on the basis of summarizing the results of final review of papers in different places in Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics eight years ago. It reviews previous literature and compares the differences between the final review of papers in different places with the local final review and the advantage of improving the academic quality and the influence of scientific journals in final review of papers in different places.[Findings] Compared with the local final review, the subject knowledge of different final experts is more comprehensive which reduces the local limitation of review and reduces the pressure of the local editorial board and aroused the enthusiasm of the different places' editorial boards.It strengthens the relationship of the editorial department and the editorial board member. It expands the academic quality of journals and their influence and improves the cited frequency and impact factor.[Conclusions] Final review of papers in different places aims at promoting the academic quality and the influence of scientific journals.